Saving Private Ryan, 1998
The story begins during World War II, at the
commencement of D-Day as Charlie Company of the Second Rangers land on Ohmaha
beach in Normany. Their commander is Captain John H. Miller (Tom Hanks). After
pressing through what seems like an
impenetrable German front, Miller and his men are immediately called upon for
another mission, this one straight from the top. In an act of compassion, a
woman from in the military’s typing pool, while in the middle of typing
hundreds of letters of condolence for those who have lost their lives, notices
three men with the same last name and address in her correspondence. When
realizing that a mother in Iowa is going to receive word that three of her sons
are not coming home, General George C. Marshall sends order that the fourth and
youngest brother be found and sent home. Thus, Miller gathers up his
troops to find the soldier who has just been granted "a free ticket home". Home
is something all of the soldiers of the squad assigned to Miller want to see.
![]()
Captain Miller
shows both Initiating Structure and Consideration in his leadership. In the
opening scenes of the movie, Miller uses a delegating style of leadership which
is task-oriented to initiate structure among the men. Later, Miller shows
consideration in his interactions with the unit while explaining why they cannot
take a German child, whose family wants the men to take her to safety.
Leader - Member Exchange Theory (LMX)3
LMX assumes that high quality relationships between leaders and followers
results in better performance and greater organizational commitment. Throughout
the movie, we see that Captain Miller obviously has very close and meaningful (ie
– high quality) relationships with his men. Perhaps this is why they are the
unit asked to save Private Ryan, and why they go above and beyond what is asked
in their specific assignment.
Discussion Questions
*
During the opening
scene Captain Miller (Tom Hanks) successfully leads the invasion to break
through the enemy lines. How is his leadership here different from his
leadership in other situations during the movie?
* Throughout the movie Captain Miller continues to lead the unit even when he
feels the mission’s objectives are not worth risking the lives of his men and
his own. How and why does Captain Miller convince his men to continue in this
meaningless assignment?
* Why does Captain Miller choose to stay when Private Ryan refuses to leave the
bridge in France? Why do his men choose to stay with him?
* Captain Miller refuses to “gripe” to his unit, stating that “gripes go
up, not down”. Why does he do this, and what does it demonstrate to his team?
* Do the Second
Rangers follow Captain Miller because of his title, or do they follow him for
other reasons? If so, why?
* Was the mission a success, even after all of the sacrifice and losses?
Competencies Addressed
Leading Others
When his medic
is shot, the unit wants to kill the German responsible, whom they have taken
captive. Captain Miller seems to understand the actions and the conflict that
unravel during this situation. He is able to find a way to show his team he
understands their anger while at the same time relieving the conflict by placing
the focus on himself and saving the German’s life.
* Interpersonal Awareness – Captain Miller is especially perceptive toward
how and why his team is thinking and acting in certain situations. Moreover,
the unit understands Miller just as much. They are all committed to each other,
maybe more than they are committed to the mission.
* Motivating Others – Miller takes charge in confusing situations such as the
beach of Normandy, yet asks for a vote when the task is more ambiguous, like
staying with Private Ryan.
* Influencing – This core competency seems to be what Miller is best at.
Cooperating with his men as a team, Persuading them to go above and beyond their
assignment, inspiring them to see the big objective of winning the war,
Resolving moral conflicts among his men, and empowering them to face German
forces that are much greater than they.
Self Management
Miller refuses
to “gripe” to his unit, yet allows them to freely gripe to him stating that
“gripes go up, not down”. The ability to listen to others complain while
retraining your own complaints shows extraordinary self control. Moreover, the
stress of war makes the Captain’s hand shake, yet he tries to control or hide
this weakness in front of his men.
* Stress Management – Captain Miller shows self control in what he tells his
unit about himself and his objections to the mission. This also demonstrates
Millers ability to tolerate the tremendous stress of being a Leader during WWII.
* Self Insight – The Second Rangers are able to recognize the self-confidence,
self-awareness, and humility of Miller.
* Work Habits – The goal orientation, both for the unit’s assignment and the
overall objective (winning the war) is another of Miller’s strongest traits.
Moreover, he follows through his goals, such as staying with Private Ryan once
they find him.
Innovation
In attempting
to stop German forces and to save Private Ryan, Miller introduces his team to a
“sticky bomb” to stop the German tanks when they have nothing else.
* Creativity – When faced with problem after problem, Captain Miller seems
to find a way to save the lives of his men by thinking outside the box.
* Managing Change – When the assignment’s objectives are changed, because
Private Ryan refuses to leave his own men, Miller is able to be sensitive to the
situation in motivating his men to fight one more time.
Social Responsibility
Miller chooses
to take out the German bunker, even though it is not in their assignment,
because he feels a civic and ethical responsibility. If he does not do this,
more allies may be killed. Furthermore, when his team wants to kill a German
hostage in revenge and anger, Miller will not allow it.
* Leading Others Ethically – Throughout the movie, Miller obviously puts the
lives of his men before his own, probably because he feels responsible for their
safety.
* Civic Responsibility – Miller also goes above and beyond the unit’s assignment
to save more than the lives of his men and his own; such as the German’s life.
1 Cummings, T.G., & Worley, C.G.
(2005). Organization Development and Change (8th edition.
Cincinatti, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
2
Judge, T.A., Piccolo, R.F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The
validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 36-51.
3 Howell, J.M., & Hall-Merenda K.E. (1999). The ties that
bind: the impact of leader – member exchange, transformational and
transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 680-694.
Leadership Central Home
Competency Model
•
Leadership Assessment
•
Development Plan
•
Development Guide
•
Research Reports
CMU •
Psychology Department
•
About This Site
•
About Us
©2004