Person and Situation Interaction
Aspects
Mischel's
Cognitive-Behavioral Theory
A. Person variables
a. Definition
People are confronted with a
potential flood of stimuli; how are these stimuli selected, perceived,
processed, interpreted, and used by the individual? They are the psychological qualities of the person that help us
to answer these questions from the cognitive social predispositions. In turn they regulate how new experiences
affect him/her.
b.
Person variables vs. Traits
|
|
Cognitive-behavioral
theory |
Trait theory |
|
Basic
elements |
Person variables: |
Traits: |
|
Individual
differences |
|
|
|
Consistency |
|
|
**
Personality coefficients???
c. Five person variables:
Summary of
Person Variables
|
Person Variables |
Exemples |
|
1. Encoding Strategies
and Personal Constructs: units for categorizing events, people, and the self. |
People
differ greatly in how encode and group information from stimulus inputs;
Mark, a teenager, tends to encode peers in terms of their hostile threats and
is highly sensitive to their possible attempts to control him. Mark will be vigilant to threats. He may see an innocent accident, such as
having push against him in the crowded staircase, as a deliberate violation. |
|
2. Expectations: specific expectancies
about the consequences of different behavioral possibilities in situations. |
When
Mark encodes being pushed by a peer as deliberate violation, will he react
with threats? The answer in part
depends on whether he expects that he would win and get peer approval or lose
and be humiliated. |
|
3. Subjective Values: the subjective value for
individuals of particular classes of events, that is, their stimulus
preferences and aversions, their likes and dislikes, their positive and
negative values |
People differ in the types of activities
they prefer and select for themselves.
Getting peer approval may be important to Mark, but not to other
people. |
|
4. Self-regulatory
Systems and Plans: rules and self-reactions for performance and for the
organization of complex behavior sequences. |
People's
self-regulatory standards and self-control systems guide their behavior. To predict Mark's reaction to being
pushed, it helps to know the personal standards he uses to evaluate when and
how to react aggressively. Will he react aggressively even if his
peer who pushed him is much younger than him? |
|
5. Competencies: ability to construct
(generate) particular cognitions and behaviors. Related to measures of IQ,
social and cognitive (mental) maturity and competence, ego development,
social-intellectual achievements and skills. |
They
refer to what the person knows and can do.
Mark's response depends on his competencies; Is he strong enough to
react aggressively to his peer? |
B.
The consistency paradox
It
refers to the fact that we think of people as being quite consistent in their
behavior when in reality most people's behavior tends to vary a good deal from
situation to situation.
How
can the paradox be explained?
--Temporal
consistency and cognitive prototypes
a. Temporal consistency
Behavior is temporally stable; that
is , people react in similar ways when the same or similar situations recur in
their lives. However, Mischel argued
that behavior is not very consistent
across different situations (cross-situational consistency) because people
are normally context-sensitive. There
is little reason to expect broad cross-situational consistency, but temporal consistency is likely.
b. Cognitive prototypes
When asked to think about a broad
behavioral category, people usually call to mind typical behaviors while
ignoring less typical behaviors. The
impression of cross-situational consistency is due to the fact that people are
temporally consistent on a few behaviors that are most typical of a trait
category, which gives the (false) impression of general consistency. People are sometimes cross-situationally
consistent, but primarily when the demands of the situation exceed their
competencies.
C.
Delay of gratification
It involves foregoing small
immediate rewards for larger rewards that will only become available later.
It increases with age and is
associated with higher intelligence, greater social responsibility and higher
achievement strivings.
Self-distraction
theory
D.
Change
a.
Rational-emotive therapy (RET; Albert Ellis)
Adler (Individual Psychology) --
"everything depends on opinion"
Thinking not only entails brain
activity but also entails perception, emotion, and movement. Therefore it would be more accurate to say a
person "perceives-moves-feels-thinks about" a problem than to simply
say s/he "thinks" about it.
One's thinking becomes one' emotion
and emoting becomes one's thought.
A-B-C
theory of personality
When a highly charged emotional consequences (C) (such as an anxiety
attack) follows a significant activation event (A) (such
as being chased by a large dog), A may seem to but actually does not cause
C. Instead emotional consequences are largely created by the individual's
belief system (B) (Oh,
dear, all dogs are dangerous and that
is horrible).
RET is based on the idea that
negative emotions and maladaptive behaviors result
directly from maladaptive thoughts and only indirectly from precipitating external events.
RET uses cognitive restructuring to
change faulty or irrational thoughts (e.g., mustabatory belief systems)
that result in negative emotions, specially, anxiety, depression, anger, and guilt.
In RET, the therapist helps the
client identify the specific maladaptive self- statements
s/he is making about some external precipitating event. Then the therapist
points out the irrational or illogical beliefs on which the self-statements are based.