Course Information
Introduction to Logic

PHL 140
3 Credits
Offered Every Semester
Meets UP Requirement

Overview

Peirce.jpg (3101 bytes)

Logic in the broadest sense is the study of the methods and principles used to distinguish correct from incorrect reasoning. Over the centuries many societies have produced thinkers who have been concerned with the study of logic. In the Western intellectual tradition, for example, the formal study of logic was pioneered by the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle and by various early Stoic philosophers including Zeno of Citium, Cleanthes, and Chrysippus. Inspired by Aristotle’s work, Islamic philosophers (particularly the philosopher Al-Farabi) developed a systematic and through treatment of the relationships between logical theory and language.

The late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries witnessed an explosion of interest and research into logic theory and the theory of symbolism, culminating in the development of various algebraic or symbolic devices for representing, testing, and evaluating the structure of reasoning. These developments in ‘symbolic’ logic, as it has come to be called, have had a profound impact on the computer revolution of the second half of the twentieth century, as computer designers and programmers work at designing the logic systems and programming languages upon which modern microcomputers operate. Logic continues to be of major importance both for its own sake and in terms of its application to computer technology.

Logic is a huge discipline, with many branches, specialties, and variations. There is simply not enough time in the course of a semester to cover everything that logic encompasses. Rather than sample too lightly, what we will do in this class is to focus on five topics in logic: (1) the relationship between arguments in ordinary language and symbolic representations of the logical form of those arguments; (2) Aristotle’s logic; (3) recognizing common forms of fallacious or incorrect reasoning; (4) the use of truth-tables to evaluate the logical structure of reasoning; and (5) mastering a simple method of determining whether an instance of reasoning is correct or incorrect without using truth-tables – a method that will be familiar to you from the study of geometry.  

Why is This a Philosophy Course?

In a way, it is odd that this is a philosophy course. Modern symbolic logic, as you will soon see, has just about as much to do with mathematics as with philosophy. In fact, modern logic is often called ‘mathematical logic’. Unlike other philosophy courses, we will not be concerned too much with arguing about logic itself (we could do this, I suppose – there is a branch of philosophy called ‘the philosophy of logic’ or ‘metalogic’ that concerns itself with various enduring philosophical questions regarding logic).

Rather than talk about philosophical issues in logic, we will concern ourselves exclusively with learning the techniques and principles of modern symbolic logic. In that way, learning about logic in this class will feel more like, say, learning about algebra or geometry. In short, our business will be more practical than philosophical.

Brief Syllabus

Text 

C. Steven Layman, The Power of Logic, 3rd edition (McGraw-Hill, 2005).

Outline

  1. Welcome and Introduction
  2. 1.1: Validity and Soundness
  3. 1.2: Forms and Counterexamples
  4. 1.3: Some “Famous” Forms
  5. More on 1.3
  6. 2.1 and 2.2: Identifying Arguments
  7. 3.1: Logic, Meaning, and Emotive Force
  8. 3.2: Definition
  9. 3.3: Using Definitions to Evaluate Arguments
  10. 4.1:Fallacies Involving Irrelevant Premises
  11. 4.2: Fallacies Involving Ambiguity
  12. 4.3: Fallacies Involving Unwarranted Assumptions
  13. Review Day
  14. Test #1 (Over Basic Distinctions, Informal Logic, and Language)
  15. 5.1: Standard Forms of Categorical Statements
  16. 5.2: The Traditional Square of Opposition
  17. 5.3: Further Immediate Inferences
  18. 6.1: Standard Form, Mood, and Figure
  19. 6.2: Venn Diagrams and Categorical Statements
  20. 6.3: Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms
  21. More on 6.3
  22. 6.4: The Modern Square of Opposition
  23. 6.5: Enthymemes
  24. 7.1: Symbolizing English Arguments
  25. 7.2: Truth Tables
  26. 7.3: Using Truth Tables to Evaluate Arguments
  27. More on 7.3
  28. 7.5: Tautology, Contradiction, Equivalence, and Contingency
  29. More on 7.5
  30. Review Day
  31. Test #2 (Over Aristotelian Logic and Truth Tables)
  32. 8.1 (Implicational Rules of Inference)
  33. More on 8.1
  34. 8.2 (Five Equivalence Rules)
  35. More on 8.2
  36. 8.3 (Five More Equivalence Rules)
  37. More on 8.3
  38. 8.4 (Conditional Proof)
  39. More on 8.4
  40. 8.5 (Reductio Ad Absurdum)
  41. More on 8.5
  42. 8.6 (Proving Theorems)
  43. More on 8.6
  44. Review Day
Links The Power of Logic Website
Stephen's Guide to the Logical Fallacies
Factasia: Logic
Metamath
Association for Symbolic Logic